| Home | Our Hope | |
| Bible Study |
|
March 15, 2026 |
| The Rise of Multi-Polar Fascism | ||
A new system of world government is rising, and we should pay attention. I heard it called Multi-Polar Fascism by Dinesh D'Souza. That's a very poor name, and I'm sure a better name will replace it in time. It isn't Fascism, certainly not the Fascism that we saw with Hitler and Mussolini. I think a better name would be Inter-Regionalism, but no one cares what I think.
We are getting the first glimpses of it right now through Tucker Carlson and his growing group. We should be concerned about it because it sounds like the early stage of the end-time government system that Revelation describes.
I've harped on this topic many times already in other studies. We are very near the beginning of Revelation's 6th Seal. I think it could happen within 10 years. There are three important changes that occur with that seal.
The order of these events is not given in the Bible. I expect the collapse of the current world government to come first, with the Holy Spirit becoming silent coincident with that or slightly after. I expect the Ezekiel 38-39 fulfilment to come well after that, maybe at the end of the 6th Seal.
In some of the studies where I've taught about this, I've said that Satan is motivated to try to change the order of events in order to falsify prophecy and make God a liar. It would make sense for him to try to bring the 10-member world government into existence before it is prophesied. If he can morph the current system into the new system, he can bypass prophecy.
Revelation describes a world government that begins with the world, or at least the significant parts of it, divided into 10 regions. These regions will almost certainly be geographic. Each region has a representative at the world government.
Revelation says this world order changes later, but that's how it starts.
We also need a little background on Fascism.
We tend to measure the kinds of government by putting a point on a single axis (line) with liberalism at one end and conservatism at the other. This is called the left-right scale.
Liberalism desires a large role for goverment in the lives of the people. This requires a large government to implement all of what they desire a government to be. They value the collective (group) over the individual. Conservatives are the complete opposite. They despise large government and want as little government as possible, and therefore as little government involvement in their lives as possible. For them, the individual is the focus, and what government there is grows out of the individuals, to serve the individuals.
That one-axis scale doesn't allow us to fully express the differences between governments. It's better to measure them on two axes, with liberalism and conservatism on one axis and Libertarianism (freedom) and totalitarianism (total government control) on the other.
This still doesn't allow us to describe all of the kinds of governments, and Multi-Polar Fascism is one of those.
The dotted area on this chart is the area where most people are. They tend toward the center. The more a person is liberal, the more he is likely to also be totalitarian. The more a person is conservative, the more he is likely to also be libertarian. In the same way, there are very few people who are both conservative and totalitarian, or liberal and libertarian. Rational people just aren't like that.
The conservative / liberal axis is most important. That's why it isn't unreasonable to use a single-axis scale to measure types of governments.
Names like "Socialism", "Communism", "Marxism", "Leninism", "Trotskyism", and many others are just minor variations on extreme liberalism that were tried after the previous ones had failed.
Fascism, as we know it from World War 2, was National Socialism. That introduces a new axis on our scale, nationalism versus internationalism. This is an even less important factor. Internationalists want to create a totalitarian one-world government. They believe this would be a Utopia. Nationalists aim to improve their nation.
Liberals have tried to link Fascism with conservatism, as though there can only ever be two points of view. That wouldn't make any sense. Fascism is totalitarian, and a conservative totalitarian is an oxymoron, as stated above. National Socialism is liberal, totalitarian, and nationalist. On our graph, they would be at the same spot as the more common liberal, totalitarian, internationalist because our graph doesn't show nationalism.
You would expect then that Fascists and Marxists would get along pretty well and even cooperate. They do not. They hate each other with a white-hot passion. The reason seems to be that nationalism is important enough that they have completely different approaches to how things should be done. Because they are both totalitarian, which, by definition, does not allow for the slightest step outside of the box, they want anyone who thinks differently to be stomped out of existence. We see that even within the Democratic Party. I think it is worth saying that they also eat from the same trough - meaning they compete for followers from people from the same liberal mindset.
Nationalism is a very natural thing, "Yay for my country!" A country that doesn't care for itself soon falls apart. So it's also a necessary thing, but if there is too much nationalism, the government gets involved in attacking other nations to advance itself, or slaughtering certain groups of people to purify itself, as Hitler's National Socialism did.
I think everyone was shocked by the quick change in Tucker Carlson and the other members of his group. They seemed like solid conservatives, then suddenly they started saying very questionable things.
Tucker Carlson's group has been influenced by Russian ideologue and nationalist Alexander Dugin. He advocates for a multi-polar world government, where the current nations of the world would be grouped into geographic regions that would be coordinated by a central body. These regions are the poles of multi-polar.
I know almost nothing about Dugin or his writings, but perhaps he thinks the large number of nations in the UN, and their unequal sizes and power, make it ineffective. No sensible person doubts that the UN is now ineffective … and corrupt.
The regions in this government would be able to rule themselves as they wished, whether it be liberalism, conservatism, or some variant of those.
The regional aspect of this system would appeal to conservatives, because it would mean each region can govern themselves as they see fit. The central body would appeal to liberals, especially if it had power, because it would look like a one-world goverment. The UN was designed not to have power so it wouldn't become a one-world government.
I mentioned that Revelation (and Daniel) describe this 10-region government as having regional representatives with no power. That changes, and the representatives become rulers.
Right away, you can see that Dugin's idea isn't conservatism, liberalism, or Fascism, though Dugin is a strong Russian nationalist. So that doesn't sound so bad. What goes unmentioned is that the central body needs to have the power to force this regional system upon the world. When that is considered, it does sound more like a totalitarian system that will promote Marxism in all regions and eventually force it.
Tucker Carlson's group does have something in common with liberalism - it does not like Jews. Right now, it soft pedals that view with statements like, "We shouldn't support Israel when they do things that are wrong." That sounds reasonable, but it leaves the unanswered question: "Who decides when Israel is doing something wrong?" If the answer to that question becomes someone who says, "Israel's existence is wrong," then we have a problem.
There is also a hypocrisy involved here. When Great Britain does something we don't like, we let them know. We don't withdraw our support so their enemies can destroy them.
Tucker Carlson and his group are promoting a world government that looks ominously like the government that Revelation describes.
As we look around, we can see that the current world order looks like it won't last much longer. When collapses such as that one have occurred in the past, poverty and starvation have been the result, and the people have begun to look for a savior. This makes it much easier for someone to conquer them. After that, all that is required is for the conqueror to implement Dugin's ideas and choose the number 10 for the number of regions, and the Club of Rome did that back in 1974.
If you've got your binoculars out to look for the anti-Christ, it's too soon. That 10-region government has to be in place before he can work his way up in its ranks.
We live in interesting times.